01
Application & API VAPT
Human-led testing of authentication, authorization, business logic, data flows, sessions, APIs, and common implementation weaknesses.
AppSec · DevSecOps · threat modelling
Embed security across architecture, code, pipelines, dependencies, testing, and release decisions. Combine threat modelling, VAPT, secure code review, and DevSecOps into a programme developers can use.
Find risk earlier, reduce repeat vulnerabilities, and ship secure products with confidence.
Who this is for
Product and engineering teams shipping web, mobile, API, or SaaS platforms
Organizations modernizing SDLC and CI/CD controls
Teams handling sensitive, regulated, or high-value data
Businesses preparing a product launch, customer review, or certification
Capabilities
A focused engagement can cover one capability or combine several into a coordinated programme.
01
Human-led testing of authentication, authorization, business logic, data flows, sessions, APIs, and common implementation weaknesses.
02
Identify trust boundaries, abuse cases, assets, actors, and mitigations during design—before weaknesses become expensive code changes.
03
Targeted manual and tool-assisted review of security-critical code, frameworks, dependencies, secrets, and dangerous implementation patterns.
04
Select, integrate, tune, and operationalize testing tools so developers receive actionable findings instead of unmanaged alert volume.
05
Add risk-based checks, secret protection, artifact integrity, container scanning, policy gates, and exception workflows to CI/CD.
06
Define standards, champion networks, training, metrics, release criteria, and governance that make secure development repeatable.
What you receive
Our approach
Confirm objectives, systems, constraints, access, timelines, and the evidence your stakeholders need.
Senior specialists execute the agreed work with clear communication and controlled, evidence-led testing.
Receive an executive view, technical findings, business impact, and prioritized remediation guidance.
Work directly with our team on remediation, validation, retesting, and the next improvement cycle.
Relevant work
Questions buyers ask
Yes. Our reports are developer-oriented, and we can run technical readouts, remediation workshops, and targeted follow-up sessions.
No. We prioritize controls based on architecture, risk, delivery model, and team maturity. Tooling should support the programme—not define it.
Ideally during design and whenever material architecture or data flows change. It is also valuable for existing high-risk applications.
Yes. We can extend the assessment to model integrations, prompts, agents, retrieval systems, data exposure, tool use, and AI-specific abuse cases.
A senior specialist will help clarify scope, evidence needs, timeline, and the right next step—without a generic sales pitch.
Request a scoping callPick a slot that works for you — a senior engineer (not a salesperson) will walk through your goals and give you a straight answer on scope, timeline, and cost.